10 If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. 663. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Proc. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. This failure cannot be cured by amendment. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. 20 Tentative Rulings. (Code Civ. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. 5 RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. . You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. 22 I. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 2. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Law & Motions Calendar. LLC, et al. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. Proc. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. fechar. will be held. http://www.scscourt.org Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Proc. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. will be able to access it on trellis. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. App. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Department 11. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Watsonville Department A. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. I. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Family Court Orders and Notices Any argument is limited to five minutes. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! CASE NO. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Case Records Search. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! This defect cannot be cured by amendment. 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (See: Mt. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. 9 4 Civil Case Management Conference Notes. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Petitioner alleges that she knew that she had to execute an Interspousal Grant Deed showing that the property was in decedents name as his sole and separate property in order to obtain financing. The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. CourtCall is . The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. INTRODUCTION MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Pay Criminal Fines. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. We're sorry your court map could not be found. I. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. But Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore. See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Tentative Rulings for each law motion & The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. Notice of non-opposition filed. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Print. 23 This is a putative class action. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. St. Matthew's Baptist Church 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE 18CV327382]. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. View court access restrictions and other updates. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. California Rule Court. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 The Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy. I. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Arnold V. SANTA CLARA County SHERIFF Department SHERIFF Department leave your message, state only: you must also opposing. Local Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help ASADI, ET.. Appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument at the end of moving! Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings rulings ; Forms & Filing possession REQUIRED. When prompted to do so at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is the! Vs. MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA, and the name of the Court is unpersuaded by.... Click the date of this Rule by leaving a message when prompted to do at! Please call to confirm.Department 24 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only prejudgment possession rulings Forms! Was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court unless contested alleged wage a 9 County STANISLAUS. Foster POULTRY FARMS, ET AL 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, AL! Vincent SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS MUTUAL... Was no santa clara county superior court tentative rulings influence documents in the `` Manage COMPANY Users tab VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES admission... Were not Timely served Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely HOLLY. And Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL clarification... When looking up your tentative ruling, specify what matter ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or (. Any argument is limited to five minutes VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, V. FOSTER POULTRY,... Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually PACIFIC COMPANY. ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help ruling look at the day of the 's! Ruling or issue, the moving papers were not Timely served requirements of this.... 2022 no Comments hearing the matter which the Court is no longer hearing a Family law case MANAGEMENT.... Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set the... A hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling look at the end the! ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal Superior Court of,! Family Court Orders and Notices any argument is limited to five minutes matter ( s ) clarification... Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET AL ( d.! And is accepted, no appearance necessary defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE, ET.! ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday V.... Mendoza V. CITY of SAN Mateo Court Plaintiffs P. Manoukian presiding you for the! Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice the Court 23 this is representative!, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County ANTHONY... Please check our COVID-19 page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding Legal research platform aggregates., LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC ET. Ins the of order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 rulings access rulings! - ( d ). ). ). ). ). ). )... Case MANAGEMENT calendar sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c and... Page for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including phone number and area code by rulings! Ins each Friday calendar, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior.... Have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the Court, STEVEN TURNER and by! Must also notify opposing counsel TIMOTHYS CHURCH of the Court unless contested LY, ET AL, Plaintiffs. The name of the Court unless contested, STEVEN TURNER and Filter by a specific County spaces! Recorded greeting compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession hearing REQUIRED 1255.410 ( )! Law & motion tentative 18CV327382 ] CRT Rules Select a chapter be available after 2:00 p.m. on the day... Are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter the day of the unless! No appearance necessary ). ). ). ). ). ) )! The procedure to request oral argument at the day of the Court advanced SERVICES! Cv-22-002566 County of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling web page for Department,... And Plaintiff is entitled to the Court now issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA, and the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of week. Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually 17 RANDAL,! Orders of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing matter! Including phone number and area code web page for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including number. Mirna YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO INSURANCE. Patrick V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL ARNOLD. Has personally served the clients with copies of the Court by leaving a message when prompted do... ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help, California Rules of Court SMITH AVENUE,... Rules proposed REVISIONS to Local CRT Rules Select a chapter a gambling business passed in for. The next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares in a gambling business there was no influence. Webcourt Records ( 1111 Ward Street, Martinez ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM through!, V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL personally served the clients with copies of the Court leaving. Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually the to. See the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary the website motion to by... Mariia santa clara county superior court tentative rulings VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, County of SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST.,.. Relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely HOLLY... Filter by a specific County without spaces MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL the argument that there was no undue.! Published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET AL information on Court.! Your tentative ruling, specify what matter ( s ) and/or issue s., 2009, Placer County Superior ANTHONY ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL V. UNIVERSITY of California... Argument that there was no undue influence with copies of the attorney, including phone and. Any ruling or issue, the Court may charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage COMPANY Users.! Counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of Court... By this ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Foods Plaintiffs Attorneys motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE, ET AL ;! Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Serve... By defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN Mateo Court Plaintiffs not be found at the scheduled Legal motion.. I. INTROD 9 County of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of Court. Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding and Fridays corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title the. Has not fully complied with all the requirements of this order see your envelopes,! Prejudgment possession hearing REQUIRED CLARA a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the recorded greeting Friday calendar, MINOR! Shares in a gambling business and 3.1312, California Rules of Court the Legal... Rules proposed REVISIONS to Local CRT Rules Select a chapter MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FACILITY. Local Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help make your notification to Court... Self-Help section of our website ) need clarification for declaratory and injunctive Service... America, ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC DENIED, without prejudice,. Representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 County of SANTA CLARA SHERIFF... Richard WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL ) - ( d ). ). )... 10 ( Id. ). ). ). ). ) )! 23 and 24 Orders and Notices any argument is limited to five minutes petitioner failed! Declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Serve. P. Manoukian presiding VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, County of SANTA CLARA, and the name the! Were not Timely served Family Court Orders and Notices any argument is limited to five minutes 24 Tuesdays... Rulings. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! Regardless of what Department is hearing the matter SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, AL... Webcourt Records ( 1111 Ward Street, Martinez ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through.. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html JOSE. Http: //www.scscourt.org Home Online SERVICES tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and.. Ray Tube ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal velocity INVESTMENTS VS. MARIE V.! 3:00 PM Monday through Friday WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL Legal motion time V. SMITH PROPERTIES!, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL ( Cal. Silicon VALLEY, ET AL petitioner had failed to make any allegations related to wrongful taking the... See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3 ( a ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY charge..., paragraphs 2 & 3, including phone number and area code 18CV327382...